Search for: "Keys v. Social Security Administration"
Results 1 - 20
of 843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
A key portion of a proposed new regulation from Social Security states that the Social Security Administration wants to change how it collects evidence in Disability cases. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:58 pm
A recent ruling from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals highlights the decision-making process that the Social Security Administration (SSA) must go through in determining whether to grant a person Social Security disability benefits. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
Astrue Social Security Disability Claimants: Help Us Help You - Irizarry v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
Additional Resources: Benefits for People With Disabilities, Social Security Administration More Blog Entries: Former NYPD Officer Pleads Guilty to $600,000 in Disability Benefits, June 28, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Social Security Disability Insurance: Myth v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 8:03 pm
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied Plaintiff's application for benefits and an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) upheld the denial on appeal. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 9:27 am
The key question in a Social Security Disability case is: can the person seeking benefits work? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:55 pm
Related blog posts: Social Security Disability Hearings: What to Expect The Social Security Disability Decision Making Process: Beeks v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
. - is often key in proving a Social Security disability claim. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:13 am
The Social Security Administration (SSA) denied the claim and Plaintiff later appeared before an SSA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) at an administrative hearing. [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:20 am
In Conley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
Unless an applicant seeking Social Security disability insurance benefits has a listed condition with severity that is recognized by the administration, he or she can expect to fight in order to secure benefits. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:19 pm
With a new administration and a new Congress come key leadership changes and new priorities at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
In the late 1930s, when federal courts appeared reluctant to vindicate equal protection claims, the federal Social Security Board (later to become part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare) took a more active role via its administration of federal grants for state-run public welfare programs. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
[xii] According to official Social Security Administration data, “[o]ver the next 50 years, new legal immigrants entering the United States will provide a net benefit of $407 billion in present value to America’s Social Security system. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The key to navigating this distinction is not “whether making official announcements could fit within the job description; but whether making official announcements is actually part of the job that the State entrusted the official to do. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Their 46-page complaint states that in 2014, in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:38 am
Such capabilities will inevitably have weaker safeguards, weaker security guarantees, make data access more physically dangerous, and have more illiberal social corrective consequences. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
or AOL accounts; Any computers or digital storage devices used by either Plaintiff during and after her employment with Defendant; Emails that pertain in way to this lawsuit; Documents, photographs, or other information concerning Dollar Tree stores or Plaintiff's claims; Any non-privileged communications or documents exchanged between Plaintiff and Trowery; Facebook and/or other social media data; Plaintiff's complete tax returns and all attachments thereto from 2007 to the present; and… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:17 pm
Yet Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm
Cal. 2010), the court held that evidence of an award of Social Security disability benefits was necessary for an adequate de novo review of the plan administrator’s determination, where the Social Security decision was rendered six months after the denial of the claimant’s final administrative appeal in the ERISA matter. [read post]
